The AME3 Rules

AME3 stands for Adaptive Metaframework for Empirical Enterprise Evolution. The framework assists an enterprise in adopting a system design grounded in three fundamental pillars: an Agile Leadership System, a Strategy for Evolution, and Enterprise-wide Rules.

The AME3 Rules enable companies to adapt their services and products to changing market conditions using empirical evidence. They foster the simultaneous evolution of services and products with the organizational structure.

AME3 sets a minimal yet sufficient number of rules to allow integration with other frameworks and methods. Thoroughly understand the impact of these rules on the entire system before attempting to make any changes. The framework targets primarily small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), though larger enterprises can implement it within sufficiently autonomous divisions.

The AME3 Rules alone are insufficient to enhance agility and results. Enterprises should adopt other methods and frameworks like Scrum, LeSS, LeSS Huge, Lean, Kanban, Wardley Mapping, or Cynefin. The choice should align with the evolutionary stages of the product and organization and the particular Ambitions.

Although some frameworks and methods may have different rules and recommendations, the combined use outweighs the inconsistencies. The AME3 Rules support easy mapping and integration with other frameworks, enhancing overall results. See Example Mapping of Methods and Frameworks for a practical illustration.

The AME3 Rules organize into two sections: the Rules of the Arena, where teams create and evolve products and services, and the Rules of the Enterprise, which provides the strategic context of Arenas. Each level defines Leadership Functions, Artifacts, and Constraints.

The AME3 Rules by design do not delve into the reasons behind the rules, how they work, or specific usage instructions. The Leadership, Strategy, and Foundation chapters provide the theoretical background. The Playbook and Interplay chapters help with practical application.


Arena

An Arena is a highly independent organizational unit within an Enterprise dedicated to a specific Ambition. It contains a complete work system with Teams, Owner, and System Lead. The Arena is defined by its Leadership functions, Artifacts, and Constraints.

Leadership Functions

Team

The Team is a leadership function in AME3 focused on improving customer satisfaction. Teams develop, provide, and maintain the Arena Product with stable membership. Each Team is supported by at least one System Lead.

  • A Team leads to improved customer satisfaction.
  • An Arena consists of one or multiple Teams.
  • All Teams in an Arena do all the work to develop, provide, and maintain the Arena Product.
  • The Team has stable membership over at least one Match, preferably for much longer.
  • Each employee is a member of only one Team at a time.
  • The Teams are responsible for keeping all work transparent.
  • Each Team is supported by at least one System Lead.
  • Team members may have different qualifications and experience. Additional roles may be defined by the Team or System Lead.

Owner

The Owner is the leadership function responsible for the success of the Arena Product in alignment with the enterprise Ambition. They hold authority over Arena Backlog ordering and capacity decisions. The Owner collaborates with System Leads while maintaining distinct accountability.

System Lead

The System Lead ensures an effective work system within the Arena and guarantees compliance with AME3 rules. They establish and enforce additional frameworks and methods as needed. Multiple System Leads can serve an Arena, collectively accountable for all Teams.

Artifacts

Artifacts on Arena level create the transparency needed to guide the Team’s work. They connect the Team’s daily efforts to the Arena’s purpose.

Improvement

An Improvement represents an enhancement to the Arena Product or work system. Teams pull Improvements from the Arena Backlog and commit to completing them within one Match, with Owner support for just-in-time decisions.

Arena Backlog

The Arena Backlog is the ordered collection of Improvements awaiting Team selection in an Arena. Teams and the Owner collaboratively create and refine these Improvements, with the Owner holding ultimate accountability for prioritization.

Arena Product

The Arena Product is the result of the Arena’s work, encompassing services and goods delivered by Teams, product development, and work system improvements. The Product evolves with each completed Improvement.

  • The Arena Product is the result of the Arena’s work. It encompasses:
  1. The services provided by the Teams’ labor.
  2. The services or goods provided by systems created by the Teams, which customers utilize or potentially use in the future.
  3. The work to improve these services. Often called product development.
  4. The work to improve the work system.

Constraints

Match

The Match defines the fixed-period constraint for Arena work in AME3. It implements the Anticipate, Advance and Assess loop. Teams autonomously manage improvements within this monthly cycle. System Leads ensure effective structures are in place.

Anticipate
Advance
  • Once a Team pulls an Improvement, they are solely responsible for its completion, including coordinating with other teams and stakeholders both within and outside the Arena.
  • Teams and the Owner collaboratively establish rules for completing Improvements.
  • The System Leads ensure that these rules are established, adhered to, and modified as necessary to maintain efficiency and effectiveness.
Assess

Enterprise

The Enterprise defines the organizational entity in AME3 that provides resources and support for Arenas. It establishes clear boundaries through Leadership Functions, Artifacts, and Constraints to ensure Arena autonomy and independence.

  • The Enterprise provides resources to support an Arena.
  • An Enterprise may encompass multiple Arenas.
  • If the Enterprise operates other business areas with products and services outside the AME3 framework, it ensures these do not interfere with the independence of the Arenas.
  • The boundaries of an Enterprise are defined by its Leadership Functions, Artifacts, and Constraints.

Leadership Functions

Accountable Representative

The Accountable Representative holds ultimate accountability for Enterprise success and societal impact. They have collective authority to initiate or discontinue Arena Products while respecting Arena autonomy. They receive full transparency and generate strategic insights.

Enterprise System Lead

The Enterprise System Lead is the System Lead for the enterprise-level work system in AME3. This leadership function ensures effective structures and processes across all Arenas while maintaining system coherence. They can also serve as System Lead for individual Arenas.

Enterprise Owner

The Enterprise Owner is the executive leadership function responsible for the success of the Enterprise Product. They have the authority to initiate or stop Arenas, change Ambitions, and order the Enterprise Backlog while considering Enterprise System Lead recommendations.

Artifacts

Artifacts on Enterprise level creating the transparency and data to lead the Enterprise. They connect the Enterprise with the Arenas and these with each other if necessary. All Artifacts of the Arenas are transparent and accessible to the Enterprise too.

Ambition

The Ambition defines the purpose, expected successes, and constraints for each Arena Product in the enterprise. It justifies an Arena’s existence and guides the Owner’s leadership. Annual refinement ensures alignment and commitment across all Team members.

  • The Ambition clarifies the purpose, expected successes, and constraints associated with the Arena Product, including financial limitations.
  • The Ambition justifies the existence and operations of an Arena.
  • The Owner is responsible for leading the development of the Arena Product towards achieving the Ambition.
  • If the Ambition is at risk, the Owner must take appropriate actions, which may include terminating the Arena Product.
  • The Ambition is reviewed and refined at least annually, with discussions involving members of all Teams to align understanding and commitment.

Goal

The Goal is a strategic objective that provides direction for all Teams within an Arena. Set by the Owner, it defines what needs to be achieved within one to nine Matches. The Goal ensures alignment between Arena work and Enterprise Ambitions.

Enterprise Backlog

The Enterprise Backlog contains all strategic Goals awaiting Arena focus. The Enterprise Owner orders this backlog, while Owners collectively define and refine Goals. Owners pull the highest priority Goals for their Arenas.

Enterprise Product

The Enterprise Product represents all products and services offered by the enterprise. It combines the Arena Products from all Arenas plus results from units not yet operating within AME3.

  • The Enterprise Product represents the combined result of work of the entire Enterprise. It includes the Products from all Arenas and results from all other units not yet operating within AME3.
  • The term ‘Enterprise Product’ is synonymous with the phrase ‘all products and services offered or are in preparation to be offered by the enterprise’.

Constraints

Tournament

The Tournament is the enterprise-level constraint that implements the Anticipate, Advance and Assess loop across the entire organization. It spans one or multiple Matches and enables Accountable Representatives to assess the Enterprise Product, while the Enterprise Owner decides on strategic changes to Ambitions and the Enterprise Backlog.


Postscript

Applying the AME3 Rules amounts to a radical shift for most companies because it typically requires significant restructuring. For new enterprises, adopting AME3 from the start is relatively straightforward. However, existing companies may need to navigate complex pathways and undertake major restructuring efforts at varying intervals. The AME3 Rules help identify necessary organizational changes.

Unlike prescriptive scaling frameworks, AME3 allows organizations the flexibility to steadily adapt their structures and processes to meet the demands of a competitive environment. The Agile frameworks and methods recommended within AME3 may occasionally conflict in detail. In cases of discrepancy, the principles of inspection and adaptation are invaluable, which is a Strategic Doctrine in AME3.